Holistic Analysis of ‘Women Empowerment’ – A Vital Quintessence from Legal, Business and Economic Perspective

  • Samrat Bandopadhyay Joint Director, Central Government Civil Services Officer, Group A, Government of India
  • Reena Banerjee Advocate, Asansol District Court, Paschim Bardhamaan
Keywords: Woman Empowerment, Family Laws, Surrogacy Act, Gender Neutrality, Gender Equality, Alternate Dispute Resolution, Hindu Succession Act

Abstract

The varied dimensions of ‘Women Empowerment’ have to be analysed from economic, political, social, cultural, psychological, philosophical and technological perspective. The empowerment of women is a holistic concept. India has been testimony to the diverse and vast cultural heritage unique to itself from time immemorial. History is replete with examples of the contribution of India for gender neutrality, equality and upliftment perspective. A man and a woman are equal and strong pillars in the edifice and bulwark of cultural fabric for society’s growth. The historic contribution of Maitreyi and Gargi are monumental in not only from the perspective of cultural and social development but also from the view of women empowerment.  The jurisprudence on woman empowerment has to be seen in a holistic manner. There is a vital facet of legal dimension of the economic and social contribution of the woman in the ecosystem of growth and development of the nation. The international efforts in the sphere of women empowerment by Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) has been instrumental in addressing some of the pertinent issues in that domain. Tackling the issues of women empowerment via Statutory provisions and by strengthening the statutory provisions in the extant laws has to be seen synergistically with the concerted efforts at community, national and international level for empowering woman with education, health care, access to basic amenities among others. The role played by women has a cultural and social dimension also which requires an inclusive and synchronized efforts in tandem by all the stakeholders in the value chain of economy and in the societal ecosystem.

References

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Section 6 of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 enables a daughter to be a Coparcener since her birth.
Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Gangamma v. G Nagarathnamma, AIR 2009 SC 2561
Prachanan Das v Ramesh Chandra Mishra, AIR 2008 Ori 34
Interpretation of Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956
The Constitution of India, 1950
Indra Sawhney & Others v Union of India 1992 SCC (L & S) supp. 1
Id.
The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021
Right to Life and Personal Liberty ensuring for life with dignity.
Constitution of India, 1950
The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021
Stated in definitive clause of Section 2(1)(g) of the The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021
Trivedi, D., Majumder, N., Pandya, M., Bhatt, A., & Chaudhari, S. P. (2022). Evaluating the global research productivity on domestic violence: a bibliometric visualisation analysis. Collection and Curation. https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-12-2021-0040
Specified in Chapter III of the The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 as “Regulation of Surrogacy and Surrogacy Procedure” in Section 4(ii)(c)
Specified in Chapter III of the The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 as “Regulation of Surrogacy and Surrogacy Procedure” in Section 4(iii)(b)(IV)
Specified in Chapter III of the The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 as “Regulation of Surrogacy and Surrogacy Procedure” in Section 4(iii)(b)(III)
WIPO, Technology Based on Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources, WIPO Magazine (Geneva, April 2007), pg.10
Salem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu v Union of India, AIR 2005 6 SCC 344
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. and Anr. v Cherian Varkey Construction Co. Pvt Ltd. and Ors. SCC OnLine 8 SCC 24.
Published
2022-07-01
How to Cite
Bandopadhyay, S., & Banerjee, R. (2022). Holistic Analysis of ‘Women Empowerment’ – A Vital Quintessence from Legal, Business and Economic Perspective. GLS Law Journal , 4(2), 1 - 5. https://doi.org/10.69974/glslawjournal.v4i2.64