Safeguards or Symbolism? The Enforcement Crisis of Women’s and Children’s Rights in India

  • Karan Gupta Student 2nd year BA.LLB (Hons), CHRIST(Deemed to be University) Bengaluru, Karnataka
  • Annadatha Venkata Sai Lasya Student 2nd year BA.LLB (Hons), CHRIST(Deemed to be University) Bengaluru, Karnataka
Keywords: Women’s Rights, Constitutional Safeguards, Gender Justice, Judicial Backlogs, Legislative Reforms

Abstract

Protection and empowerment of women and children remain at the forefront of the Indian Constitution framework by giving equality, justice, and dignity to the relationships and marginalized families. Despite an established Constitutional and legislative framework, the reality of lived experiences manifests systemic indifference and persistent socio-legal disparities. While the Indian Constitution enshrines provisions such as equality, prohibits exploitation, child labor, and affirmative actions for the empowerment of women and children, bureaucratic inefficiencies, cultural and institutional barriers hinder its effectiveness. The paper critically explores the disconnect between constitutional ideas and their limited realization through legislative safeguards. Additionally, the study considers whether the provisions effectively address children’s and women's vulnerabilities, and whether the intended purpose amounts to results.  The paper uses a mixed-methods approach by combining doctrinal analysis with empirical research to assess whether rights-based safeguards for women and children are adequate. The paper comprehensively discusses the statutory law, the government reports, the NCRB, the NFHS data, and real-world case scenarios to explore the real-world implementation effectively. The Findings reveal stark disparities between legal mandates and their ground-level enforcement, including a 4% increase in violence against women and overwhelming judicial backlogs (95% case pendency). While judicial activism has expanded, these protection failures, such as inadequate victim support, infrastructure, and gender-insensitive law, undermine its efficiency. The paper underscores collaborative multidimensional reforms from all stakeholders, such as judicial capacity building, accountability, and targeted grassroots-level programmes to combat these challenges. The research indicates that going from constitutional commitments to social action entails legal reform and conscious and transformational change to protect the rights of women and children in India.

References

Vishnu Patil. Tripathi, “Constitutional and Legal Provisions for Women Empowerment in India”6 IJL. 227, 228-232 (2020)
Dr. S.K. Rai, “Constitutional Safeguards Towards Women in India” 9 IJCRT. 293,296,298(2021)
Supra Note 1
Supra Note 2
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597.
India Constitution. art. 14.
Neeraj Kumar, “Article 14 of the Indian Constitution” 3 IJALR (2023)
Air India vs Nargesh Meerza 1981 AIR 1829
Debt vs Equity in the Digital Finance Era: Assessing the Capital Structure-Financial Performance Nexus in Fintech Companies in India. AEIDA [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 1 [cited 2025 Jul. 8];1(2):7-16. Available from: https://aeidajournal.org/index.php/AEIDA/article/view/7
India Constitution. Art. 15(3)
PM CARES for Children, About Us, https://pmcaresforchildren.in/aboutus (last visited May 23, 2025).
India Constitution. Art. 24
PTI, “Eight Child Labourers Rescued from Illegal E-Waste Factory in UP's Sambhal”, The New Indian Express (Aug. 13, 2024),https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2024/Aug/13/eight-child-labourers-rescued-from-illegal-e-waste-factory-in-ups-sambhal.
India Constitution. Art. 42

Puja Changoiwala, “Zomato’s Decision to Grant Period Leaves Is a Step in the Right Direction”, Indian Express (Aug. 18, 2020, 8:55 AM), https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/zomatos-decision-to-grant-period-leaves-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction-6581781/.
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, Sec. 2(n), No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 2013 (India).
India's POSH Act: “Key Compliance Requirements for Employers”, Lexology (May 15, 2023), https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e411077d-5594-439d-9bfa-499f8c8c66f0. (last visited May 21, 2025)
A Decade of the POSH Act: “What the Data Tells Us About How India Inc. Has Fared”, Centre for Econ. Data & Analysis, Ashoka Univ. (Feb. 28, 2023), https://ceda.ashoka.edu.in/a-decade-of-the-posh-act-what-the-data-tells-us-about-how-india-inc-has-fared/. (last visited May 21, 2025)
Nitika Sharma, “The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021 with Special Reference to Reproductive Rights in India”, 10 International Journal of Law. 64 (2024).
The Indian Express, “SC Allows 30-Week Abortion for Rape Survivor” (July 2024), https://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-abortion-rape-survivor-30-week-pregnancy-9283907 (last visited May 22, 2025)
S. Panneer Selvam et al. “Rights of Children in India: Constitutional Provisions and Policies” 13 Internal Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 420, 422-423 (2025)
Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Amendment Act, No. 35 of 2016, Section 2(ii) India Code (1986).
India Constitution. Art. 21A

National Human Rights Commission, “NHRC India Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Reported Rescue of 23 Child Labourers”, NHRC (July 17, 2024), https://nhrc.nic.in/media/press-release/nhrc-india-takes-suo-motu-cognizance-reported-rescue-23-child-labourers. (last visited May 22, 2025)
Vishaka V. State of Rajasthan AIR 1997
Independent Thought v. Union of India AIR 2017
Joseph Shine v. Union of India AIR 2018
National Crime Records Bureau, Crime In India 2022, at 211(Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India 2023)
Id at 317
Id at 242
Id at 350
Id at 242
National Commission for Women,“Annual Report 2022-23 (2023)”. https://ncwapps.nic.in/pdfReports/AnnualReport2022_2023_Eng.pdf ( last visited May 22, 2025)
Farheen Nahvi, “In the Shadow of Conflict: An Overview of Support Services of Gender-Based Violence in Kashmir, Plus a Directory of Resources”, THE PRAJNYA TRUST (Apr. 25, 2022), https://prajnya.in/storage/app/media/kashfar.pdf. (last visited May 22, 2025)
Sneha Biswas, “'Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao' Failed To Show Desired Results: Parliamentary Committee Report”, Republicworld. (Dec. 10, 2021), https://www.republicworld.com/india/beti-bachao-beti-padhao-failed-to-show-desired-results-parliamentary-co mmittee-report. (last visited May23, 2025)
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & ICF, “National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5)”, India, 2019-21, at 622 (2021) https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR375/FR375.pdf
Id at 673
National Crime Records Bureau Crime in India 2022, at 305, 353 (Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India 2023).
Reach Alliance, Why Women’s Police Stations in India Fail to Mitigate Violence Against Women 8 (2021), https://reachalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WPS-Final-March29-1.pdf (Last visited May 23, 2025)
Published
2025-07-01
How to Cite
Gupta, K., & Lasya, A. V. S. (2025). Safeguards or Symbolism? The Enforcement Crisis of Women’s and Children’s Rights in India. GLS Law Journal , 7(2), 88 - 98. https://doi.org/10.69974/glslawjournal.v7i2.191