Reframing Punishment: Buddhist and Jain Perspectives on Crime, Karma and Restorative Justice

  • Kavya Gokhru Research Scholar, Svyasa Yoga University, Bangalore
Keywords: Buddhism, Jainism, Restorative Justice, Karma, Criminal Justice Reform, Compassion, Non-Violence

Abstract

This paper examines how Buddhist and Jain philosophical traditions offer transformative perspectives on criminal justice, emphasizing healing, restoration, and moral development over retributive punishment. Through an analysis of karmic principles, the doctrine of interdependence, and the centrality of compassion in both traditions, this study demonstrates how ancient wisdom can inform contemporary restorative justice practices. The research reveals that both Buddhism and Jainism conceptualize crime not as isolated acts deserving punishment, but as manifestations of suffering and ignorance requiring compassionate intervention. By integrating these perspectives with modern restorative justice frameworks, criminal justice systems can shift from cycles of harm to processes of healing, accountability, and community restoration.

References

Acharanga Sutra. (1884). Trans. by Hermann Jacobi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bodhi, B. (2011). What Does Mindfulness Really Mean? A Canonical Perspective. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 19-39.
Kalpa Sutra. (1879). Trans. by Hermann Jacobi. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus.
Travis, J., & Petersilia, J. (2001). Reentry Reconsidered: A New Look at an Old Question. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 291-313.
Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into Crime: An Overview of General Strain Theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.
Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Published
2025-07-01
How to Cite
Gokhru, K. (2025). Reframing Punishment: Buddhist and Jain Perspectives on Crime, Karma and Restorative Justice. GLS Law Journal , 7(2), 44 - 51. https://doi.org/10.69974/glslawjournal.v7i2.187