Purview of Trade Dress Protection in India
Abstract
The article explores the concept of trade dress protection in the context of India's evolving legal landscape. Trade dress, the overall visual appearance and aesthetic identity of a product, is gaining significance due to its role in brand identity and consumer recognition. This article examines the origins of trade dress, its importance in consumer protection, and the challenges it poses in the Indian legal framework, where explicit provisions for trade dress are limited. Through a comprehensive analysis of judicial precedents, the article highlights landmark cases that have contributed to the development of trade dress protection in India, focusing on aspects such as packaging, shape, color combinations, and product form. The objective of trade dress is to prevent confusion among consumers and protect the unique features that distinguish a product in the market. While India is catching up with international norms, there is a need for a more robust and coherent legal framework to safeguard trade dress. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of enhancing enforcement mechanisms and fostering a strong culture of trade dress protection to promote innovation, maintain fair competition, and instill consumer confidence in the marketplace.
References
Rachel v. Banana Republic, Inc. , 831 F.2d 1503, 1506
Anu Tiwari, Passing off and the Law on ‘Trade Dress’ Protection: Reflections on Colgate v Anchor 10 JIPR , 182-190 (2005) , http://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/09AE0DD1-E248-4AC7-9E9D-91FE5675E4AB.pdf
529 US 205 (2000)
Ruchika Mohanty , Trade Dress Protection: An Indian Perspective, IPR LAW INDIA (Jan 21, 2021), https://iprlawindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Ruchika-Mohanty-.pdf.
AIR 1951 Bom 147,
2003 VIIIAD Delhi 228
1972 AIR 1359
Soumya Sinha, The Emerging Concept of Trade Dress: Does India Require a Change in Legislation? THE IP LAW POST, (June 10, 2022), https://iplawpost.wordpress.com/2022/06/10/the-emerging-concept-of-trade-dress-does-india-require-a-change-in-legislation/.
Arjun Garg and Alfred Aaron Joseph, Trade Dress Protection-Comparative Study of the Global and Indian Position, LIVE LAW (Jan 20, 2022), https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/trade-dress-protection-gsl-chambers-trade-marks-act-of-1999-189908?.
Chadha & Chadha Intellectual Property Law Firm ,Trade Dress under Indian Law, LEXOLOGY (Oct 3, 2018) ,https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5f72da58-5565-483f-8d37-927f71c14af5.
Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. 1992 SCC OnLine US SC 97
id. at 3
M/S S.M. Dyechem Ltd v. M/S Cadbury (India) Ltd , 2001 AIR SCW 1411
Company v. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd, 2003 VIIIAD Delhi 228
id. at 8
supra note 9
ILR 1973 Delhi 393
Scope of 'Trade Dress' Protection and Infringement in India, INDIA LAW OFFICES LLP (Mar 1, 2022),https://www.indialawoffices.com/legal-articles/scope-of-trade-dress.
Beiersdorf Ag v. Rsh Global Private Limited & Anr , CS(COMM) 48/2021
Id. at 7
Siddharth Raj Choudhary, Protection of Trade Dress in India - Trademark – India, MONDAQ (Jan 25, 2022) ,https://www.mondaq.com/india/trademark/1153586/protection-of-trade-dress-in-india.
142 (2007) DLT 724
Pragya Sharma , Trade Dress Protection Position in U.S and India an Analysis, LEGAL SERVICE INDIA, https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1239-trade-dress-protection-position-in-u-s-and-india-an-analysis.html.
2011 (4) BomCR 1
Arijit Mishra , Trade Dress Protection in India and the US, IPLEADERS (Feb 12, 2020), https://blog.ipleaders.in/trade-dress-protection/.
I.A. No.13750/2010
RFA (OS)(COMM) 13/2018 & CM 29064/2018
Muskan Mahajan , Christian Louboutin SAS V. Abubaker & Ors., 2018 (7) AD (DEL) 376 , FASHION LAW JOURNAL (Dec 30, 2022) ,https://fashionlawjournal.com/christian-louboutin-sas-v-abubaker-ors-2018-7-ad-del-376/.
CS(L) NO.1100 OF 2019
id. at 11