Fundamental Rights through the Lens of Prisoners
Abstract
The term Imprisonment feature, directed from the correction technique of each sovereignty in the nation has been growing quickly over and over a long period. Around 11.5 million prisoners across the nation, according to the “World Prisoners Population list” and in accord with “National Crime Records Bureau Ministry of Home Affairs” there are 1319 prisoner’s homes in the country (India) having 5,54,034 prisoners but at the same there are 547 inmates are in jail across the India in which 4,27,165 are undertrial and the convicts are 1,22,852 which could be a country’s population. While researching, “the researcher carried many case laws, books, journals etc. the paper aims to examine judicial attitude towards prisoners under Indian law”. The purpose is to analyse the fundamental rights of the prisoners. This Research focuses on primordial, law organisation, and legal provisions that are supported by the relevant case laws. All are born equal and are having some basic fundamental rights. The rights basically are right to life and liberty. Also, the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Gideon v. Wainwright , right to counsel was established under the 6th amendment, regardless of a defendant’s ability to pay for an advocate. The "Father of our Nation" Mahatma Gandhi was correct when he said, "Hate the Crime, but not the Criminal." Years and years ago, the situation of the inmates was even worse because they were treated like "animals" and had no access to provisioners. After a decade, society had discovered that there are some basic fundamental rights that should be given to the prisoners. If a person relegate a crime, it does not mean that he has quitted being human that he denudes off his life which consists of human dignity. And the reconstructing of prions and their rights in India needs prime attention.
References
National Crime Record Bureau, https://ncrb.gov.in/sites/default/files/PSI-2021/Executive_ncrb_Summary-2021.pdf (last visited Feb. 10, 2023)
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335
Paridhi Verma, Rights of Prisoners under Indian Law, 2 PEN ACCLAIMS, 1-2(2018)
A S Raj, The Early history of the Modern prison System, 22 Social Defence, 10-16(1987)
Id.
RPS Teji, The Prison, Object and Reforms, Delhi district court (Feb. 11, 2023, 4:32 PM), https://delhidistrictcourts.nic.in/ejournals/RPS%20TEJI%20-%20PRISON%20OBJECT%20REFORMS.pdf
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Challa Ramkrishnan Reddy, (2000) 5 SCC 712
Paridhi Verma, Rights of Prisoners under Indian Law, 2 PEN ACCLAIMS, 3(2018)
RPS Teji, The Prison, Object and Reforms, Delhi district court (Feb. 11, 2023, 6:22 PM), https://delhidistrictcourts.nic.in/ejournals/RPS%20TEJI%20-%20PRISON%20OBJECT%20REFORMS.pdf
Paridhi Verma, Rights of Prisoners under Indian Law, 2 PEN ACCLAIMS, 3(2018)
Varsha Kumari Mishra, Rights of Prisoners in India: Prisoner Rights Under Indian Laws and Judgment, B&B Associates LLP, (Feb.15, 2023, 05:08 PM, https://bnblegal.com/article/rights-of-prisoners-in-india-prisoner-rights-under-indian-laws-and-judgments/
INDIA CONST. art. 39A, amended by The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976
INDIA CONST. art. 21
Code of criminal procedure, 1973, § 50, No. 02, Acts of Parliament, 1973 (India)
Code of criminal procedure, 1973, § 54, No. 02, Acts of Parliament, 1973 (India)
Code of criminal procedure, 1973, § 55-A, No. 02, Acts of Parliament, 1973 (India)
Code of criminal procedure, 1973, § 56, No. 02, Acts of Parliament, 1973 (India)
Code of criminal procedure, 1973, § 41-D, No. 02, Acts of Parliament, 1973 (India)
Live Law, https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/calcutta-high-court-s41d-crpc-arrested-person-right-advocate-ed-212937 (last visited Feb. 15, 2023)
Code of criminal procedure, 1973, § 304, cl. 1. No. 02, Acts of Parliament, 1973 (India)
Prisons Act, 1894, § 27, No. 9, Acts of Central Government, 1894 (India)
Prisons Act, 1894, § 31, No. 9, Acts of Central Government, 1894 (India)
A.K. Gopalan v. Union of India, AIR 1950 SC 27
Charles Shobraj v. Superintendent, Tihar Jail, 1978 S.C. 1514
Joginder Kumar v. State, 1994 (4) SCC, 260
M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra, (1978) 3 SCC 544
D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal, (1997) 1 SCC 416
People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235
State of Maharashtra vs. Prabhakar Pandurang Sangzgiri, 1966 SCR (1) 702